Looking at Replicants in Blade Runner Using Theories of Cyborg (Unit 4. Creative Research)
looking
at replicants
in
blade runner using theories of cyborg
Essay
by Adam Paloczy
Two
final frontiers are existing in the genre of sci-fi. One of them is the dark
space, the other one is the endless, deep, and extremely complex human mind.
Lots
of movies took the audience into the cosmos, to seek out for new adventures, to
find the secrets of unknown, and only a few of them are trying to open up the
difficult and the deep human mind. Blade
Runner was always a bit more introverted than most of the other big science
fiction films. Therefore it's not that easy to digest to everyone, it was less
successful than the easygoing full of action and adventure, spectacle space
movies.
Behind The Magic
"Unlike
the vast majority of films in the science fiction genre, Blade Runner refuses
to neutralize the most abhorrent tendencies of our age and casts serious doubt
on a host of the cliches about where we should locate their causes. Among the
most significant questions, it challenges us to confront are: In what does the
"truly human" consist? Does the concept of imitating "truly
human" beings retain any coherence once the feasibility of designing
"more human than human" robots becomes an increasingly imaginable
technological possibility? What might relations between the sexes and family
life become if the twin eventuality of uninhabitable earth and the perfection
of robotic technologies should come about? "[1] Although back In 1982, Blade Runner was a technical miracle
in cinemas, this film with the slow story and the deep messages was not a
financial success at the box offices. But a bit later on, after the videotape
release, Ridley Scotts' fantastic masterpiece became one of the most important
sci-fi and also a cult movie. Such a creation like this has so small chance for
a sequel. Most of the target audience has not read the original novel „ Do The
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” from Philip K Dick and have not seen the
original movie. These days people want to go to watch a film with crazy action,
explosion, and big noise. They are not able to react for two and a half hours of
thick emotional impact.
Haraway's A Cyborg Manifesto and Blade Runner
Albeit,
in the world of Blade Runner, we reached the space, the colonizing expeditions
started to create new homes, these films are still focusing on what happening
on Earth and in the minds of the biorobots, called the replicants.
In
Donna Haraway's A Cyborg Manifesto, the idea of the cyborg is used to symbolise
"an ironic political myth" which tries to be "faithful to
feminism, socialism, and materialism".[2]
Haraway sees the image of the cyborg as present in both our contemporary
society's fiction and reality. She uses the cyborg as a metaphor that describes
our "social and bodily reality". The image of the cyborg, for
Haraway, also symbolises the bridging of gaps and the tearing down of
traditional boundaries, and thus the cyborg becomes an important political
symbol of liberation, but is also a symbol for "dangerous
possibilities"[3]
The
replicants featured in Blade Runner are considered to be completely
machine and synthetic, however, since they manifest human emotions and share
the human form to the point where they are indistinguishable to humans, it can
be argued that in a way they are a hybridisation of human and machine, and thus
can be considered to bridge the gaps and tear down the boundaries that
Haraway's image of the cyborg challenges. One of the most persistent themes in Blade
Runner is obviously the fuzziness of the boundary between humans and the
featured replicants.[4]
The second similarity between Haraway's vision and that of Scott is that there is a
parallelism between the rejection of a 'female' essence by Haraway and the
'replicant' essence that the viewer of Blade Runner is somehow guided to
reject due to Rachael's successful transcendence of her android nature.[5] Donna
Haraway writes: "There is nothing about being 'female' that naturally
binds women. There is not even such a state as 'being' female, itself a highly
complex category constructed in contested sexual scientific discourses and
other social practices."[6]
The third similarity is that politically, both the concepts of Haraway's cyborg and
Scott's replicant can be seen simultaneously as a symbol of hope and a symbol
of "dangerous possibilities"[7]
Cyborgs as tools of the Power
In
this mad world, a massive company called the Tyrell Corporation has invented
and started to manufacture the replicants. Instead of human resources, They
used these biorobots for the colonizing and other dangerous work. But these
creations where so humanlike, and many of them escaped and returned to Earth.
They tried to get their own right to live, thereby they caused a serious
conflict on Earth. All of this lead to genocide, which was supported by the
Tyrell Corporation.
Later
on, famine swept across the Earth, the Tyrell Corporation has closed, and they
stopped to make replicants. From this chaos, slowly but surely a new company,
the Wallace Corporation raised, which has solved the crisis with genetically
modified food. This is where the second chapter of Blade Runner is starting.
There are three short films in between the feature films.
Blade
Runner 2049 directed by Danny Villeneuve, who has already proofed us with
Arrival, that he does not like ordinary stereotypical sci-fi. The film created
in neo-noir style, just like the original. This is a dark, foggy, rainy, world with neon lights, where we do not know
if its day or night. This is a different world, a possible future of our home,
where the sunshine can not really reach the dirty street of Los Angeles, across
the poisoned atmosphere of our planet. People just like rats are living int he
cyberpunk concrete jungles, mixed with biorobots. We can feel from every single
frame of the film the depressing mood, the human duality and we can witness to
die of our devastated planet. it's wonderful to see the fantastic technological
development of mankind, and it's also very sad to see what we achieved with all
of this. We have flying cars, but we can not afford a pet or a flower. Every
technological invention, what supposed to make our life easier and comfortable,
started to choke us. Our planet is just a place to make more replicants. Just like a big factory nothing more than
that. Everybody who had a chance has already moved away from here and left this
dying planet. This film represents a beautifully created, but very pessimistic
vision of our future, with so many details, which makes everything just even
scarier to me. I'm saying it is scary because I can see our possible future in
this film, with the massive, rich and powerful dangerous corporations and the
possibility of the ethical and moral issues that we will face when we will,
because, I believe we will create cyborgs may be less than 50 years.
At the
same time, Blade Runner does not want to represent the replicant just like a
simple killer machine, like in Terminator 1, these biorobots are more human
than humans, who has every right for freedom and life. At this point, we can
see mankind/ Tyrell and Wallace companies as „creators” just like God with big
power. The director of the Wallace Corporation is basically acting like a god. With
his power, he can decide which replicant can live, for how long, and who should
die. He does not need to explain anything to anyone. His massive building, just
like a homeworld of some kind of god. Everything is massive, with no furniture,
television, or anything like in an ordinary home. Wallace the director, thinks
that he is a sort of god, and for me, it feels like, he does not see himself as
human anymore. He does not have moral control, he creates and destroys
replicants. He is the lord of that world.
Harrison
Ford, Sean Young, James Olmos, Rotger Hauer, Ryan Gosling, or Jared Leto were
the perfect choice for these movies. But Blade Runner is not memorable only
from the great acting. This is more like a „feeling movie” for me, which right
at the beginning grab you with that strong melancholic atmosphere, and it holds
you until the very end. Maybe that's why either you like this movie, or you
feel it is boring.
"Blade
Runner is itself an off-shoot of a genre which had virtually disappeared from
screens: the hardboiled detective story, such as the classics born from the
novels of Raymond Chandler and James M. Cain. The dystopian air of "Blade
Runner" should feel very familiar to fans of such dark-hued crime stories
as "The Big Sleep," "Double Indemnity," "The Postman
Always Rings Twice" and "Out of the Past" – stories in which
urban centres like Los Angeles were hotbeds of vice and scandal, with a
seen-it-all narrator presiding above the fray. "[8]
In
this movie I have not seen sets, I saw reality. I did not see robots or humans,
I saw sentient beings. I feel that in this film there are no unnecessary scenes
or action. It feels like every small detail has a meaning and it gives something
into the movie. At this time, the massive Coca Cola logo does not feel like
just a sponsor, it looks more the power of the big brands and how these multi
corporations will grow in the future, also we have a chance to see a world
where everything and everybody is just a nameless consumer or just a product
with a serial number on this poor planet. In this future, every meter is advertising space, and you can
find 10 000 opportunities at every corner to forget how to be a human
being.
In
this film we can see that the replicants feel more, they want to live more than
humans. As I said before, they are just more humans than humans. They feel
deeper, and they insist on life much more than the empty people who are just
wasting life and dating, digital neo bitches. Maybe because of this
uncomfortable message of the film can be a reason why Blade Runner can not be a
box office hit. Perhaps people do not want to accept this kind of strong
critics about our society.
31/05/2020
Bibliography
-Haraway,
Donna. Simians, Cyborgs And Women: The
Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge, 1991
-Blade
Runner By David Morgan https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-film-preservation-board/documents/blade_runner.pdf
-Fenech, C. Can
Donna Haraway's ideas on cyborg fit into Ridley Scott's vision of the future in
Blade Runner?
-William,
D. Ideology as Dystopia: An Interpretation of Blade Runner
-Scott,
R. Blade Runner (1982) [Movie,
Final Cut Edition, Warner Bros.]
-Villeneuve, D. Blade Runner 2049 (2017) [Movie, Warner Bros.]
[1] https://web.stanford.edu/~jonahw/PWR1/Docs/Williams-BladeRunner.pdf
Ideology as
Dystopia: An Interpretation of Blade Runner DOUGLAS E. WILLIAM
[2] Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature
(1991), p.149
[3] Ibid. p.154
[4] Chris Fenech:Can Donna
Haraway's ideas on cyborg fit into Ridley Scott's vision of the future in Blade
Runner?
[5] Ibid. p. 3
[6] Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of the Natural (1991), p.155
[7] Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of the Natural (1991), p.155
[8] https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/national-film-preservation-board/documents/blade_runner.pdf
Blade Runner
By David Morgan
Comments
Post a Comment